BackMerit Medical Systems Overview

Merit Medical Systems Total Current Liabilities

Merit Medical Systems's total current liabilities is $220M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$216.87M
10.19% YoYΔ $20.05M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Merit Medical Systems Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Merit Medical Systems vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Merit Medical Systems Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Merit Medical Systems (MMSI) FAQ

Merit Medical Systems posts a total current liabilities of $220M as of March 2026. That compares with $200M in the prior-year period — up 10.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Merit Medical Systems's total current liabilities was $200M. The latest reading is $220M — a 10.2% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Merit Medical Systems's financial statement story. At $220M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MMSI's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Merit Medical Systems's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Merit Medical Systems against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $220M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.