BackMeta Materials Overview

Meta Materials Receivables

Track Meta Materials's receivables ($2.1M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$2.12M
↓ 65.00% YoYΔ $-3.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Meta Materials Receivables History

Loading

Meta Materials vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Meta Materials Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Meta Materials (MMAT) FAQ

Meta Materials (MMAT) currently reports a receivables of $2.1M as of March 2024. That compares with $6.1M in the prior-year period — down 65.0% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Meta Materials's receivables history and peer comparisons.

Meta Materials's receivables decreased from $6.1M to $2.1M — a 65.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2024). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Meta Materials reported $2.1M in receivables as of March 2024. That compares with $6.1M in the prior-year period — down 65.0% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $2.1M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Meta Materials, and consider following MMAT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Meta Materials is classified in the Energy sector. On receivables, it currently shows $2.1M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Energy are usually more informative than comparing MMAT with unrelated industries.