BackStealth BioTherapeutics Overview

Stealth BioTherapeutics Net Tangible Assets

Track Stealth BioTherapeutics's net tangible assets ($-52M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-52.32M
333.12% YoYΔ $-40.24M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Stealth BioTherapeutics Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Stealth BioTherapeutics vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Stealth BioTherapeutics Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Stealth BioTherapeutics (MITO) FAQ

Stealth BioTherapeutics posts a net tangible assets of $-52M as of March 2022. That compares with $-12M in the prior-year period — down 333.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Stealth BioTherapeutics's net tangible assets was $-12M. The latest reading is $-52M — a 333.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Stealth BioTherapeutics's financial statement story. At $-52M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MITO's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Stealth BioTherapeutics's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Stealth BioTherapeutics against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-52M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.