BackMonarch Casino & Resort Overview

Monarch Casino & Resort Total Liabilities

Track Monarch Casino & Resort's total liabilities ($160M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$164.39M
1.29% YoYΔ $-2.15M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Monarch Casino & Resort Total Liabilities History

Loading

Monarch Casino & Resort vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Monarch Casino & Resort Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) FAQ

Monarch Casino & Resort posts a total liabilities of $160M as of June 2026. That compares with $170M in the prior-year period — down 1.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Monarch Casino & Resort's total liabilities was $170M. The latest reading is $160M — a 1.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Monarch Casino & Resort's financial statement story. At $160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MCRI's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Monarch Casino & Resort's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Monarch Casino & Resort against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.