BackMembership Collective GroupClass A Overview

Membership Collective GroupClass A Receivables

Membership Collective GroupClass A's receivables is $68M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$68.32M
5.81% YoYΔ $-4.21M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Membership Collective GroupClass A Receivables History

Loading

Membership Collective GroupClass A vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Membership Collective GroupClass A Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Membership Collective GroupClass A (MCG) FAQ

Membership Collective GroupClass A posts a receivables of $68M as of September 2025. That compares with $73M in the prior-year period — down 5.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Membership Collective GroupClass A's receivables was $73M. The latest reading is $68M — a 5.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Membership Collective GroupClass A's financial statement story. At $68M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MCG's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Membership Collective GroupClass A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Membership Collective GroupClass A against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $68M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.