BackMaxar Technologies Overview

Maxar Technologies Other Current Liabilities

Track Maxar Technologies's other current liabilities ($240M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$244.00M
46.96% YoYΔ $-216.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Maxar Technologies Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Maxar Technologies vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Maxar Technologies Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Maxar Technologies (MAXR) FAQ

Maxar Technologies posts a other current liabilities of $240M as of March 2023. That compares with $460M in the prior-year period — down 47.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Maxar Technologies's other current liabilities was $460M. The latest reading is $240M — a 47.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Maxar Technologies's financial statement story. At $240M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MAXR's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Maxar Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Maxar Technologies against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $240M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.