BackMatthews International Overview

Matthews International Total Current Liabilities

Track Matthews International's total current liabilities ($290M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$293.17M
28.72% YoYΔ $-118.11M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Matthews International Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Matthews International vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Matthews International Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Matthews International (MATW) FAQ

Matthews International (MATW) currently reports a total current liabilities of $290M as of March 2026. That compares with $410M in the prior-year period — down 28.7% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Matthews International's total current liabilities history and peer comparisons.

Matthews International's total current liabilities decreased from $410M to $290M — a 28.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Matthews International reported $290M in total current liabilities as of March 2026. That compares with $410M in the prior-year period — down 28.7% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current total current liabilities of $290M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Matthews International, and consider following MATW for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Matthews International is classified in the Industrials sector. On total current liabilities, it currently shows $290M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Industrials are usually more informative than comparing MATW with unrelated industries.