BackMAG Silver Overview

MAG Silver Receivables

Track MAG Silver's receivables ($850K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$850889.00
↓ 14.73% YoYΔ $-146964.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

MAG Silver Receivables History

Loading

MAG Silver vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

MAG Silver Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

MAG Silver (MAG) FAQ

MAG Silver (MAG) currently reports a receivables of $850K as of June 2025. That compares with $1M in the prior-year period — down 14.7% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore MAG Silver's receivables history and peer comparisons.

MAG Silver's receivables decreased from $1M to $850K — a 14.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2025). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

MAG Silver reported $850K in receivables as of June 2025. That compares with $1M in the prior-year period — down 14.7% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $850K, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for MAG Silver, and consider following MAG for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

MAG Silver is classified in the Materials sector. On receivables, it currently shows $850K. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing MAG with unrelated industries.