BackLvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE Overview

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for LVMUY: $72B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$72.05B
3.55% YoYΔ $-2.65B vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE Total Liabilities History

Loading

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE (LVMUY) FAQ

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE posts a total liabilities of $72B as of June 2026. That compares with $75B in the prior-year period — down 3.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE's total liabilities was $75B. The latest reading is $72B — a 3.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE's financial statement story. At $72B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LVMUY's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Lvmh Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $72B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.