BackLattice Semiconductor Overview

Lattice Semiconductor Total Liabilities

Track Lattice Semiconductor's total liabilities ($160M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$158.82M
37.22% YoYΔ $43.08M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Lattice Semiconductor Total Liabilities History

Loading

Lattice Semiconductor vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Lattice Semiconductor Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) FAQ

Lattice Semiconductor posts a total liabilities of $160M as of April 2026. That compares with $120M in the prior-year period — up 37.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Lattice Semiconductor's total liabilities was $120M. The latest reading is $160M — a 37.2% year-over-year increase (period ending April 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Lattice Semiconductor's financial statement story. At $160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LSCC's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Lattice Semiconductor's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Lattice Semiconductor against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.