BackAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF Overview

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF Total Assets

Latest total assets for LOGO: $2.1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$2.09B
↓ 0.59% YoYΔ $-12.30M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF Total Assets History

Loading

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) FAQ

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF posts a total assets of $2.1B as of December 2021. That compares with $2.1B in the prior-year period — down 0.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's total assets was $2.1B. The latest reading is $2.1B — a 0.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's financial statement story. At $2.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LOGO's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $2.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.