BackLondon Stock Exchange Group Overview

London Stock Exchange Group Accounts Payable

Track London Stock Exchange Group's accounts payable ($1.8B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$1.80B
6.94% YoYΔ $117.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group Accounts Payable History

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group (LNSTY) FAQ

London Stock Exchange Group posts a accounts payable of $1.8B as of June 2025. That compares with $1.7B in the prior-year period — up 6.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, London Stock Exchange Group's accounts payable was $1.7B. The latest reading is $1.8B — a 6.9% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of London Stock Exchange Group's financial statement story. At $1.8B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LNSTY's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; London Stock Exchange Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging London Stock Exchange Group against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $1.8B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.