BackLindblad Expeditions Holdings Overview

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Total Assets

Track Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's total assets ($1.1B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$1.13B
↑ 15.26% YoYΔ $148.99M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Total Assets History

Loading

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings (LIND) FAQ

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings posts a total assets of $1.1B as of September 2026. That compares with $980M in the prior-year period — up 15.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's total assets was $980M. The latest reading is $1.1B — a 15.3% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's financial statement story. At $1.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LIND's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Lindblad Expeditions Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.