BackLion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) Overview

Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) Receivables

Latest receivables for LGHLW: $1.3M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.27M
19.18% YoYΔ $205124.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) Receivables History

Loading

Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) (LGHLW) FAQ

Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) posts a receivables of $1.3M as of December 2025. That compares with $1.1M in the prior-year period — up 19.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025)'s receivables was $1.1M. The latest reading is $1.3M — a 19.2% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025)'s financial statement story. At $1.3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LGHLW's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Lion Group Holding Ltd - Warrants (17/06/2025) against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1.3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.