BackLifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Overview

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Net Tangible Assets

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's net tangible assets is $15M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$15.04M
3928.57% YoYΔ $15.43M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (LFMDP) FAQ

LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A posts a net tangible assets of $15M as of March 2026. That compares with $-390K in the prior-year period — up 3928.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's net tangible assets was $-390K. The latest reading is $15M — a 3928.6% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's financial statement story. At $15M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LFMDP's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging LifeMD- 8.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $15M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.