BackChina Life Insurance Overview

China Life Insurance Total Current Liabilities

Track China Life Insurance's total current liabilities ($29B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$28.86B
60.07% YoYΔ $-43.42B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Life Insurance Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

China Life Insurance vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

China Life Insurance Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Life Insurance (LFC) FAQ

China Life Insurance posts a total current liabilities of $29B as of September 2024. That compares with $72B in the prior-year period — down 60.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Life Insurance's total current liabilities was $72B. The latest reading is $29B — a 60.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of China Life Insurance's financial statement story. At $29B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LFC's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Life Insurance's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Life Insurance against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $29B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.