BackLondon Stock Exchange Group plc Overview

London Stock Exchange Group plc Receivables

Track London Stock Exchange Group plc's receivables ($1.8B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.83B
↓ 81.43% YoYΔ $-8.01B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group plc Receivables History

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group plc vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group plc Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

London Stock Exchange Group plc (LDNXF) FAQ

London Stock Exchange Group plc posts a receivables of $1.8B as of June 2026. That compares with $9.8B in the prior-year period — down 81.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, London Stock Exchange Group plc's receivables was $9.8B. The latest reading is $1.8B — a 81.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of London Stock Exchange Group plc's financial statement story. At $1.8B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LDNXF's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; London Stock Exchange Group plc's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging London Stock Exchange Group plc against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1.8B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.