Back4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) Overview

4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for LBPSW: $32M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$32.42M
15.90% YoYΔ $4.45M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) (LBPSW) FAQ

4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) posts a net tangible assets of $32M as of December 2021. That compares with $28M in the prior-year period — up 15.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, 4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025)'s net tangible assets was $28M. The latest reading is $32M — a 15.9% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of 4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025)'s financial statement story. At $32M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LBPSW's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; 4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging 4d Pharma Plc - Warrants (22/02/2025) against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $32M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.