BackKULR Technology Group Overview

KULR Technology Group Net Tangible Assets

Track KULR Technology Group's net tangible assets ($73M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$72.57M
46.81% YoYΔ $-63.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

KULR Technology Group Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

KULR Technology Group vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

KULR Technology Group Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

KULR Technology Group (KULR) FAQ

KULR Technology Group posts a net tangible assets of $73M as of June 2026. That compares with $140M in the prior-year period — down 46.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, KULR Technology Group's net tangible assets was $140M. The latest reading is $73M — a 46.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of KULR Technology Group's financial statement story. At $73M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KULR's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; KULR Technology Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging KULR Technology Group against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $73M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.