BackKimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units Overview

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units Long Term Debt

Latest long-term debt for KRP: $450M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$445.23M
46.63% YoYΔ $141.58M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units Long Term Debt History

Loading

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units (KRP) FAQ

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units posts a long-term debt of $450M as of March 2026. That compares with $300M in the prior-year period — up 46.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units's long-term debt was $300M. The latest reading is $450M — a 46.6% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units's financial statement story. At $450M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KRP's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kimbell Royalty Partners LP - Units against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $450M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.