BackKandi Technologies Group Overview

Kandi Technologies Group Net Tangible Assets

Kandi Technologies Group's net tangible assets is $310M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$307.71M
↓ 13.55% YoYΔ $-48.24M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Kandi Technologies Group Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Kandi Technologies Group vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Kandi Technologies Group Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Kandi Technologies Group (KNDI) FAQ

Kandi Technologies Group posts a net tangible assets of $310M as of June 2026. That compares with $360M in the prior-year period — down 13.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Kandi Technologies Group's net tangible assets was $360M. The latest reading is $310M — a 13.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Kandi Technologies Group's financial statement story. At $310M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KNDI's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kandi Technologies Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kandi Technologies Group against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $310M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.