BackKirin Holdings , Ltd. Overview

Kirin Holdings , Ltd. Net Tangible Assets

Track Kirin Holdings , Ltd.'s net tangible assets ($1.7T) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1680.67B
19.43% YoYΔ $273.42B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Kirin Holdings , Ltd. Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Kirin Holdings , Ltd. vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Kirin Holdings , Ltd. Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Kirin Holdings , Ltd. (KNBWY) FAQ

Kirin Holdings , Ltd. posts a net tangible assets of $1.7T as of June 2026. That compares with $1.4T in the prior-year period — up 19.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Kirin Holdings , Ltd.'s net tangible assets was $1.4T. The latest reading is $1.7T — a 19.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Kirin Holdings , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $1.7T, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KNBWY's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kirin Holdings , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kirin Holdings , Ltd. against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.7T here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.