BackKeysight Technologies Overview

Keysight Technologies Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for KEYS: $2.6B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$2.65B
64.13% YoYΔ $1.03B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Keysight Technologies Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Keysight Technologies vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Keysight Technologies Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Keysight Technologies (KEYS) FAQ

Keysight Technologies posts a total current liabilities of $2.6B as of April 2026. That compares with $1.6B in the prior-year period — up 64.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Keysight Technologies's total current liabilities was $1.6B. The latest reading is $2.6B — a 64.1% year-over-year increase (period ending April 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Keysight Technologies's financial statement story. At $2.6B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KEYS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Keysight Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Keysight Technologies against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.6B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.