BackKoninklijke DSM N.V. Overview

Koninklijke DSM N.V. Receivables

Track Koninklijke DSM N.V.'s receivables ($0) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$0.00

Peer average

Loading

Koninklijke DSM N.V. Receivables History

Loading

Koninklijke DSM N.V. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Koninklijke DSM N.V. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Koninklijke DSM N.V. (KDSKF) FAQ

Koninklijke DSM N.V. (KDSKF) currently reports a receivables of $0 as of December 2022. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Use the charts on this page to explore Koninklijke DSM N.V.'s receivables history and peer comparisons.

Koninklijke DSM N.V.'s receivables changed from $0 to $0 (period ending December 2022). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Koninklijke DSM N.V. reported $0 in receivables as of December 2022. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $0, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Koninklijke DSM N.V., and consider following KDSKF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Koninklijke DSM N.V. is classified in the Materials sector. On receivables, it currently shows $0. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing KDSKF with unrelated industries.