BackKimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. Overview

Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. Long Term Debt

Latest long-term debt for KCDMY: $33B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$32.62B
61.58% YoYΔ $12.43B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. Long Term Debt History

Loading

Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. (KCDMY) FAQ

Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. posts a long-term debt of $33B as of June 2026. That compares with $20B in the prior-year period — up 61.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A.'s long-term debt was $20B. The latest reading is $33B — a 61.6% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A.'s financial statement story. At $33B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KCDMY's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kimberly - Clark de Mexico S.A. against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $33B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.