BackKalVista Pharmaceuticals Overview

KalVista Pharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for KALV: $-2.7M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-2.71M
101.87% YoYΔ $-147.84M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

KalVista Pharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

KalVista Pharmaceuticals vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

KalVista Pharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

KalVista Pharmaceuticals (KALV) FAQ

KalVista Pharmaceuticals posts a net tangible assets of $-2.7M as of January 2026. That compares with $150M in the prior-year period — down 101.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, KalVista Pharmaceuticals's net tangible assets was $150M. The latest reading is $-2.7M — a 101.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending January 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of KalVista Pharmaceuticals's financial statement story. At $-2.7M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KALV's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; KalVista Pharmaceuticals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging KalVista Pharmaceuticals against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-2.7M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.