BackChina Finance Online Ltd. Overview

China Finance Online Ltd. Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for JRJC: $67M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$67.24M
0.03% YoYΔ $-20000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Finance Online Ltd. Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

China Finance Online Ltd. vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

China Finance Online Ltd. Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Finance Online Ltd. (JRJC) FAQ

China Finance Online Ltd. posts a total current liabilities of $67M as of June 2021. That compares with $67M in the prior-year period — up 0.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Finance Online Ltd.'s total current liabilities was $67M. The latest reading is $67M — essentially flat versus a year earlier (period ending June 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of China Finance Online Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $67M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for JRJC's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Finance Online Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Finance Online Ltd. against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $67M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.