BackJinkoSolar Holding Ltd Overview

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd Total Current Liabilities

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd's total current liabilities is $58B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$57.85B
14.02% YoYΔ $7.11B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd (JKS) FAQ

JinkoSolar Holding Ltd posts a total current liabilities of $58B as of March 2026. That compares with $51B in the prior-year period — up 14.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, JinkoSolar Holding Ltd's total current liabilities was $51B. The latest reading is $58B — a 14.0% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of JinkoSolar Holding Ltd's financial statement story. At $58B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for JKS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; JinkoSolar Holding Ltd's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging JinkoSolar Holding Ltd against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $58B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.