BackCommunications Systems Overview

Communications Systems Other Current Liabilities

Communications Systems's other current liabilities is $3.9M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$3.86M
64.33% YoYΔ $-6.96M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Communications Systems Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Communications Systems vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Communications Systems Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Communications Systems (JCS) FAQ

Communications Systems posts a other current liabilities of $3.9M as of March 2026. That compares with $11M in the prior-year period — down 64.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Communications Systems's other current liabilities was $11M. The latest reading is $3.9M — a 64.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Communications Systems's financial statement story. At $3.9M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for JCS's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Communications Systems's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Communications Systems against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $3.9M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.