BackJ.B. Hunt Transport Services Overview

J.B. Hunt Transport Services Other Current Assets

Latest other current assets for JBHT: $350M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Assets
$347.91M
23.32% YoYΔ $-105.83M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

J.B. Hunt Transport Services Other Current Assets History

Loading

J.B. Hunt Transport Services vs. peers: Other Current Assets Comparison

Loading

J.B. Hunt Transport Services Other Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT) FAQ

J.B. Hunt Transport Services posts a other current assets of $350M as of June 2026. That compares with $450M in the prior-year period — down 23.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, J.B. Hunt Transport Services's other current assets was $450M. The latest reading is $350M — a 23.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Assets is one piece of J.B. Hunt Transport Services's financial statement story. At $350M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for JBHT's other current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; J.B. Hunt Transport Services's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging J.B. Hunt Transport Services against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current assets easier to interpret. Start with $350M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.