BackNAYA Biosciences Common Stock Overview

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock Total Liabilities

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock's total liabilities is $9.3B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$9.34B
44.01% YoYΔ $-7.34B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock Total Liabilities History

Loading

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock (IVF) FAQ

NAYA Biosciences Common Stock posts a total liabilities of $9.3B as of June 2026. That compares with $17B in the prior-year period — down 44.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NAYA Biosciences Common Stock's total liabilities was $17B. The latest reading is $9.3B — a 44.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of NAYA Biosciences Common Stock's financial statement story. At $9.3B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IVF's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NAYA Biosciences Common Stock's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NAYA Biosciences Common Stock against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $9.3B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.