BackIterum Therapeutics Plc Overview

Iterum Therapeutics Plc Net Tangible Assets

Track Iterum Therapeutics Plc's net tangible assets ($-7.4M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-7.38M
35.86% YoYΔ $4.13M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Iterum Therapeutics Plc Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Iterum Therapeutics Plc vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Iterum Therapeutics Plc Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Iterum Therapeutics Plc (ITRM) FAQ

Iterum Therapeutics Plc posts a net tangible assets of $-7.4M as of September 2025. That compares with $-12M in the prior-year period — up 35.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Iterum Therapeutics Plc's net tangible assets was $-12M. The latest reading is $-7.4M — a 35.9% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Iterum Therapeutics Plc's financial statement story. At $-7.4M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ITRM's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Iterum Therapeutics Plc's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Iterum Therapeutics Plc against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-7.4M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.