BackIntra-Cellular Therapies Overview

Intra-Cellular Therapies Total Current Liabilities

Intra-Cellular Therapies's total current liabilities is $210M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$205.70M
66.50% YoYΔ $82.16M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Intra-Cellular Therapies Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Intra-Cellular Therapies vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Intra-Cellular Therapies Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Intra-Cellular Therapies (ITCI) FAQ

Intra-Cellular Therapies posts a total current liabilities of $210M as of December 2024. That compares with $120M in the prior-year period — up 66.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Intra-Cellular Therapies's total current liabilities was $120M. The latest reading is $210M — a 66.5% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Intra-Cellular Therapies's financial statement story. At $210M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ITCI's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Intra-Cellular Therapies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Intra-Cellular Therapies against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $210M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.