BackIndra Sistemas, S.A. Overview

Indra Sistemas, S.A. Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for ISMAF: $3.9B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$3.89B
↑ 43.18% YoYΔ $1.17B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Indra Sistemas, S.A. Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Indra Sistemas, S.A. vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Indra Sistemas, S.A. Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Indra Sistemas, S.A. (ISMAF) FAQ

Indra Sistemas, S.A. posts a total current liabilities of $3.9B as of June 2026. That compares with $2.7B in the prior-year period — up 43.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Indra Sistemas, S.A.'s total current liabilities was $2.7B. The latest reading is $3.9B — a 43.2% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Indra Sistemas, S.A.'s financial statement story. At $3.9B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ISMAF's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Indra Sistemas, S.A.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Indra Sistemas, S.A. against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $3.9B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.