BackInternational Research Public Company Limited Overview

International Research Public Company Limited Receivables

Track International Research Public Company Limited's receivables ($790M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$788.10M
↑ 9.82% YoYΔ $70.44M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

International Research Public Company Limited Receivables History

Loading

International Research Public Company Limited vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

International Research Public Company Limited Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

International Research Public Company Limited (IRCP.BK) FAQ

International Research Public Company Limited posts a receivables of $790M as of June 2026. That compares with $720M in the prior-year period — up 9.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, International Research Public Company Limited's receivables was $720M. The latest reading is $790M — a 9.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of International Research Public Company Limited's financial statement story. At $790M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IRCP.BK's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; International Research Public Company Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging International Research Public Company Limited against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $790M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.