BackInternational Power Group Overview

International Power Group Net Tangible Assets

Track International Power Group's net tangible assets ($-970K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-970573.00
652.89% YoYΔ $-1.15M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

International Power Group Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

International Power Group vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

International Power Group Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

International Power Group (IPWG) FAQ

International Power Group posts a net tangible assets of $-970K as of September 2008. That compares with $180K in the prior-year period — down 652.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, International Power Group's net tangible assets was $180K. The latest reading is $-970K — a 652.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2008). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of International Power Group's financial statement story. At $-970K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IPWG's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; International Power Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging International Power Group against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-970K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.