BackInternational Paper Overview

International Paper Other Current Liabilities

Track International Paper's other current liabilities ($6.5B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$6.50B
5.68% YoYΔ $-392.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

International Paper Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

International Paper vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

International Paper Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

International Paper (IP) FAQ

International Paper posts a other current liabilities of $6.5B as of June 2026. That compares with $6.9B in the prior-year period — down 5.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, International Paper's other current liabilities was $6.9B. The latest reading is $6.5B — a 5.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of International Paper's financial statement story. At $6.5B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IP's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; International Paper's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging International Paper against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $6.5B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.