BackInsight Molecular Diagnostics Overview

Insight Molecular Diagnostics Receivables

Track Insight Molecular Diagnostics's receivables ($190K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$192000.00
↓ 62.50% YoYΔ $-320000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Insight Molecular Diagnostics Receivables History

Loading

Insight Molecular Diagnostics vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Insight Molecular Diagnostics Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Insight Molecular Diagnostics (IMDX) FAQ

Insight Molecular Diagnostics posts a receivables of $190K as of June 2026. That compares with $510K in the prior-year period — down 62.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Insight Molecular Diagnostics's receivables was $510K. The latest reading is $190K — a 62.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Insight Molecular Diagnostics's financial statement story. At $190K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IMDX's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Insight Molecular Diagnostics's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Insight Molecular Diagnostics against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $190K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.