BackCoherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A Overview

Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A Receivables

Latest receivables for IIVI: $1.3B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.34B
96.90% YoYΔ $-42.01B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A Receivables History

Loading

Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A (IIVI) FAQ

Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A posts a receivables of $1.3B as of June 2026. That compares with $43B in the prior-year period — down 96.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A's receivables was $43B. The latest reading is $1.3B — a 96.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A's financial statement story. At $1.3B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IIVI's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Coherent - 6% PRF CONVERT 01/07/2023 USD 200 - Ser A against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1.3B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.