BackIndependence Contract Drilling Overview

Independence Contract Drilling Receivables

Track Independence Contract Drilling's receivables ($21M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$21.28M
20.83% YoYΔ $-5.60M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Independence Contract Drilling Receivables History

Loading

Independence Contract Drilling vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Independence Contract Drilling Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Independence Contract Drilling (ICD) FAQ

Independence Contract Drilling posts a receivables of $21M as of September 2024. That compares with $27M in the prior-year period — down 20.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Independence Contract Drilling's receivables was $27M. The latest reading is $21M — a 20.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Independence Contract Drilling's financial statement story. At $21M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ICD's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Independence Contract Drilling's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Independence Contract Drilling against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $21M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.