BackHudson Pacific Properties Overview

Hudson Pacific Properties Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for HPP: $300M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$299.61M
4.67% YoYΔ $-14.69M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Hudson Pacific Properties Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Hudson Pacific Properties vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Hudson Pacific Properties Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) FAQ

Hudson Pacific Properties posts a total current liabilities of $300M as of June 2026. That compares with $310M in the prior-year period — down 4.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Hudson Pacific Properties's total current liabilities was $310M. The latest reading is $300M — a 4.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Hudson Pacific Properties's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HPP's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Hudson Pacific Properties's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Hudson Pacific Properties against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.