BackHoneywell International Overview

Honeywell International Total Liabilities

Track Honeywell International's total liabilities ($30B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$30.02B
↓ 52.48% YoYΔ $-33.15B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Honeywell International Total Liabilities History

Loading

Honeywell International vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Honeywell International Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Honeywell International (HON) FAQ

Honeywell International posts a total liabilities of $30B as of September 2026. That compares with $63B in the prior-year period — down 52.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Honeywell International's total liabilities was $63B. The latest reading is $30B — a 52.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Honeywell International's financial statement story. At $30B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HON's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Honeywell International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Honeywell International against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $30B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.