BackHuaneng Power International Overview

Huaneng Power International Intangible Assets

Huaneng Power International's intangible assets is $4.4B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$4.42B
74.68% YoYΔ $-13.03B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Huaneng Power International Intangible Assets History

Loading

Huaneng Power International vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Huaneng Power International Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Huaneng Power International (HNP) FAQ

Huaneng Power International posts a intangible assets of $4.4B as of December 2021. That compares with $17B in the prior-year period — down 74.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Huaneng Power International's intangible assets was $17B. The latest reading is $4.4B — a 74.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Huaneng Power International's financial statement story. At $4.4B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HNP's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Huaneng Power International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Huaneng Power International against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $4.4B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.