BackHailiang Education Group Overview

Hailiang Education Group Net Tangible Assets

Hailiang Education Group's net tangible assets is $2.2B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$2.20B
8.68% YoYΔ $175.67M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Hailiang Education Group Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Hailiang Education Group vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Hailiang Education Group Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Hailiang Education Group (HLG) FAQ

Hailiang Education Group posts a net tangible assets of $2.2B as of June 2021. That compares with $2B in the prior-year period — up 8.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Hailiang Education Group's net tangible assets was $2B. The latest reading is $2.2B — a 8.7% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Hailiang Education Group's financial statement story. At $2.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HLG's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Hailiang Education Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Hailiang Education Group against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $2.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.