BackHK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments Overview

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments Receivables

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments's receivables is $1.9B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.89B
6.77% YoYΔ $119.51M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments Receivables History

Loading

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments (HKCVF) FAQ

HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments posts a receivables of $1.9B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.8B in the prior-year period — up 6.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments's receivables was $1.8B. The latest reading is $1.9B — a 6.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments's financial statement story. At $1.9B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HKCVF's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1.9B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.