BackHancock Jaffe Laboratories Overview

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories Net Tangible Assets

Track Hancock Jaffe Laboratories's net tangible assets ($21M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$20.67M
37.47% YoYΔ $-12.39M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories (HJLI) FAQ

Hancock Jaffe Laboratories posts a net tangible assets of $21M as of June 2026. That compares with $33M in the prior-year period — down 37.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Hancock Jaffe Laboratories's net tangible assets was $33M. The latest reading is $21M — a 37.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Hancock Jaffe Laboratories's financial statement story. At $21M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HJLI's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Hancock Jaffe Laboratories's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Hancock Jaffe Laboratories against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $21M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.