BackHecla Mining Company Overview

Hecla Mining Company Total Current Liabilities

Hecla Mining Company's total current liabilities is $150M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$148.55M
↓ 23.02% YoYΔ $-44.41M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Hecla Mining Company Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Hecla Mining Company vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Hecla Mining Company Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Hecla Mining Company (HCL.DE) FAQ

Hecla Mining Company posts a total current liabilities of $150M as of June 2026. That compares with $190M in the prior-year period — down 23.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Hecla Mining Company's total current liabilities was $190M. The latest reading is $150M — a 23.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Hecla Mining Company's financial statement story. At $150M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HCL.DE's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Hecla Mining Company's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Hecla Mining Company against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $150M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.