BackHallmark Financial Services Overview

Hallmark Financial Services Current Assets

Track Hallmark Financial Services's current assets ($350M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$345.74M
73.77% YoYΔ $-972.20M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Hallmark Financial Services Current Assets History

Loading

Hallmark Financial Services vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Hallmark Financial Services Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Hallmark Financial Services (HALL) FAQ

Hallmark Financial Services posts a current assets of $350M as of September 2023. That compares with $1.3B in the prior-year period — down 73.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Hallmark Financial Services's current assets was $1.3B. The latest reading is $350M — a 73.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Hallmark Financial Services's financial statement story. At $350M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HALL's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Hallmark Financial Services's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Hallmark Financial Services against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $350M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.