BackGreenwave Technology Solutions Overview

Greenwave Technology Solutions Net Tangible Assets

Greenwave Technology Solutions's net tangible assets is $21M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$21.19M
↓ 44.16% YoYΔ $-16.76M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Greenwave Technology Solutions Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Greenwave Technology Solutions vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Greenwave Technology Solutions Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) FAQ

Greenwave Technology Solutions posts a net tangible assets of $21M as of June 2026. That compares with $38M in the prior-year period — down 44.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Greenwave Technology Solutions's net tangible assets was $38M. The latest reading is $21M — a 44.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Greenwave Technology Solutions's financial statement story. At $21M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GWAV's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Greenwave Technology Solutions's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Greenwave Technology Solutions against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $21M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.