BackFerroglobe Plc Overview

Ferroglobe Plc Current Cash

Latest current cash for GSM: $96M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$96.39M
↓ 25.44% YoYΔ $-32.89M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Ferroglobe Plc Current Cash History

Loading

Ferroglobe Plc vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

Ferroglobe Plc Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Ferroglobe Plc (GSM) FAQ

Ferroglobe Plc (GSM) currently reports a current cash of $96M as of March 2026. That compares with $130M in the prior-year period — down 25.4% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Ferroglobe Plc's current cash history and peer comparisons.

Ferroglobe Plc's current cash decreased from $130M to $96M — a 25.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Ferroglobe Plc reported $96M in current cash as of March 2026. That compares with $130M in the prior-year period — down 25.4% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current current cash of $96M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Ferroglobe Plc, and consider following GSM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Ferroglobe Plc is classified in the Materials sector. On current cash, it currently shows $96M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing GSM with unrelated industries.